So now that Murry was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter would that mean that Michael Jackson is innocent of being a addict? The blame game meaning that when Murry was found guilty, Jackson was innocent of any fault or addiction. This is denial! See it s it is. Michael Jackson was a addict with alot of money and Murry was his pusher. A perfect match and a match Jackson wanted. Each are guilty, the user and supplier in real life.
The Jackson family finally finds closure by this guilty verdict because somehow, someway it makes them feel Michael was not guilty of anything. They feel it clears the Jackson name just like Michaels past child involvement cases did. The see it as Michael wasnt a addict he was a victim of Murry as if Michael fought off the drugs when in reality he begged for them at any price. Denial 100% denial. If the Jackson family would have rid themselves of this denial of the problems Michael had perhaps he would still be alive. The family is just as guilty as anyone of ignoring the signs of all the issues Michael had now and in the past. There is a group blame here. We agree with the verdict but to the Jacksons, Murry was the scapegoat in clearing Michael of his own guilt and addiction as if Murry forcefully administered the drugs thus killing Michael. Maybe Michael got away with too much in life, remembering the past issues, that is killed him. Maybe Lohan is next?
